Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Daim: Malaysia needs stability, clear policies

KUALA LUMPUR, July 22 — Former economic czar Tun Daim Zainuddin has suggested that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi put together contingency plans to better manage the economy which is headed for tougher times and to prepare Malaysians for the worst.
Describing the current mood as bearish, he alluded to the lack of strong leadership and clear policies which he said was confusing to Malaysians as well as foreign investors.
“At present, there is a perception that the government is weak and politically not stable, and people lack confidence in it. ... They want to see where the government is heading,” he said.
Daim's views on the current economic situation was sought by Malaysian Business, his answers in the July 16 issue indicating that the man credited with the country's rapid growth in the 1990s is on the same page as his former boss Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad when it comes to Abdullah's political and economic performance to date.
Stating that he was not here to advise the government, he stressed that he was concerned the government “should not be too obsessed with the deficit” — currently around 3.2 per cent of gross domestic product — “as there must be growth too”.
Because of its concerns over the deficit, Abdullah's administration shelved a number of planned projects in 2004 when he took over the leadership from Dr Mahathir, incurring the wrath of the latter. One such project was the electrified double tracking train project. It was estimated to cost RM12 billion to build from Johor Baru to Padang Besar in 2003. Revived late last year, the cost has ballooned to RM14.5 billion — and is only for the portion from Ipoh to Padang Besar.
Daim, who holds substantial interest in the ICB Banking Group, observed that reviving these projects would be costlier now because of the increase in construction costs, a point that the federal government acknowledged recently when it allocated an additional RM20 billion for the 9th Malaysia Plan to deal with higher building expenses.
The two-time finance minister and former ally of Dr Mahathir before they fell out in 2001, was also of the view that the ringgit peg had been lifted too early — even though it was seven years later in 2005, and in response to China's scrapping of its fixed peg. “I think we rushed to remove the peg. Retaining the peg gives us flexibility,” he commented, but agreed that a strong ringgit would not harm the economy. “We just need to be efficient.”
Foreign investors were put off by the present political environment, and corruption, the judicial crisis, security and political stability had to be addressed, he said. “The government claims it is transparent and accountable but policies must be clear and unambiguous. No flip-flops. Be consistent.”
Alluding to the current administration's lack of options to deal with soaring inflation and the current economic problems, Daim, who headed the National Economic Action Council during the Asian financial crisis and was tasked with getting the country back on track, asked what the government planned to do if oil hits US$200 per barrel as predicted. “Subsidy is out of the question. Any alternatives? The government has to think ahead and plan for the future.”
The embattled Abdullah, who recently announced a transition plan to hand over the premiership to his deputy, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, in June 2010 following the ruling Barisan Nasional's worst showing at the polls in March, has found no shortage of criticism or advice.
His harshest critic has been Dr Mahathir who yesterday, writing in his blog, suggested that the government “should really look at the whole economy” and seek ways to reduce the extra burden on the people caused by higher oil prices, “not piecemeal but in a comprehensive way”.
With his trademark sarcasm, he concluded: “Sorry, I know I am not in the government, not even in Umno.” — Singapore BT

tunku : that is pak lah specialty. he knows how to increase the cost of a project. he has wasted billions of ringgit. we can't tolerate him for another 2 years.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tun Daim - another potential candidate for UMNO president?

Tak Dak Nama 3

Anonymous said...

the recent power-struggle between the big boys have not helped one bit. I agree that more focus is needed on the economical survival our country will be put through very soon, if not already. Which is why I see the power-transition as a good, stabilizing move, as well as AAB's staying out of the mud-slinging. His drive to push through the judicial reform with Zaid will hopefully be met with less inner resistance now. As well as his barring the IGP and AG from the on-going sodomy charge. In any case, very wise move there to disassociate himself with everything that happened 10 years ago.

Anonymous said...

In my personal opinion I believe that the current pressures pointed against the government is too much which apparently weakening its stand and destabilize the political affairs in the country.

People are now tend to be lack of confidence towards the administration of the current government and diverting their interest towards popular hot opposition led by Anwar and his goons.

The current leadership under Pak Lah did not showed any physical progress on the country unlike during the TDM. His actions in postponing and canceling mega projects because of lacking funds had angered many citizens. This does not include of the fuel hike price, scandalous DPM Najib and also his son in law KJ.

However, one should not look on one side. They should realise that the country is evolving towards more openness practice of democracy ruling in the country. Not to forget the enhancement of agricultural sector, reformations on judicial and ACA.

Under AAB leadership, I could see there are reformations going on. But the pace is much slow which I think is good enough for the citizens making adjustments preventing impacts on the revolutions. He will eventually fulfill his promise to make reformations demanded by the citizens in 2003 which he is welcomed to the initiation of the reform actions in the previous government policies.

Anonymous said...

In order to be a step ahead we shouldn't be afraid to experience difficulty. I agree with what wisdomthinker has to say.
We need to detach ourselves from the artificial surrounding that we've been living all this while.
It's time for us to face the music, our over-dependency to the government is what weakens us from the inside. We refuse changes, we see it as a hassle.
Pak Lah is trying to lessen the dependency and prepare us for the future but instead his intentions often misunderstood by many.

Anonymous said...

Reform without results, is not reform.
Initiating reform with grave economic and political consequences is not leadership.
WHen you need to change a direction, you need a leader, not a manager.
When you need results, its not just good intentions and concepts but effectiveness.
No, Badawi Must Go.
If Malaysians (Not just UMNO) don't believe in him, no way can his "Charismatic Leadership" show any different results that what we have seen for the past years.
I urge those who still think that he can to snap yourselves out of your dreamland.
His track record is for all to see.
It will not change within two years.

BadawiJustDon'tHaveItInHimToInspire.