It has been widely reported that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim reneged on a
brokered, pre-election deal to accept the results of GE13. The
agreement, between Anwar and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and
brokered by Jusuf Kalla, Indonesia's former Vice President, required the
loser to accept the results and work toward national reconciliation.
It was Anwar's idea.
Anwar, of course, immediately claimed the results were fraudulent and
began a series of illegal rallies and protests, claiming that the
Government is illegitimate.
Jusuf Kalla instead revealed the way Anwar broke his own deal. The Wall Street Journal was very clear.
Once news of the deal broke, Anwar deployed an evolving series of
excuses for his violation of the agreement. Najib had said cruel things
about him, Anwar said, and this was a condition of the agreement Najib
violated. Najib committed fraud. Najib never signed the document.
And, he added, Kalla had reached out to him to enter the agreement in
the first place. It was certainly never Anwar's idea. (That last is
especially important inside of Pakatan Rakyat, as it has been reported
that Anwar never bothered to share the fact of the deal with his
coalition partners, leaving Lim Guan Eng in particular furious about
finding out about it along with the rest of the country.)
One by one, Anwar's excuses have been demolished.
Kalla made clear in an interview with The Wall Street Journal
that it was indeed Anwar who had reached out to him, and added his
displeasure at Anwar's violation of the clear terms of the deal. "On
Monday (May 6), I asked Anwar to accept it and look at reality. But they
said, 'No, no, no, no.' "
Now, all of Anwar's excuses have been authoritatively demolished by
the very man who broke the news of the deal in the first place.
It was reported some weeks ago that Hamid Awaludin, the former Indonesian minister of law and human rights, wrote a scathing editorial in Koran Tempo, the Indonesian newspaper, in which he first outlined the deal and Anwar's breach.
Hamid was a witness to all of the dealings related to the agreement,
and he has personally and authoritatively rubbished each of Anwar's
excuses.
"It was Jusuf Kalla who accepted Anwar's request to mediate. He
(Jusuf) did not take the initiative and approach Anwar," Hamid has said
in an interview, explaining that Anwar had "convinced himself that he
would win the election" because of favourable polling and large ceramah
turnout.
Yet it gets worse for Anwar.
On the so-called preconditions that Najib allegedly violated: "I am
very sure that there were no preconditions discussed between Jusuf Kalla
and Anwar. For me, a deal is a deal. And there was a deal that both
parties – Anwar and Najib – agreed to. Some people always try and find a
loophole after the event, or an excuse not to deliver on their promise.
Some people are different in character to others."
This had been, for a time, Anwar's first excuse. It is now clear that
there were no preconditions. There was simply a straightforward
agreement to accept the election results.
It does not end there. Anwar has of late alleged that Najib refused
to sign the deal, so there was no deal on which Anwar could be said to
have reneged. (This of course contradicts his earlier assertion that
there was a deal, but Najib violated it. Anwar has never been overly
attached to consistency.)
Hamid here is brutal. "Anwar knew that Najib did not sign the
agreement. Najib had very reasonable political reasons for not signing
the agreement and Anwar understood and accepted it.
"But Najib gave his word that he would honour the agreement. He
consented to the agreement. Basic morality teaches us that a man's word
is more important than his signature. And deeds are more important than
any declaration. Najib delivered on his promise. He called for national
reconciliation during his election result acceptance speech. Najib's
deeds matched his word."
In other words, Anwar accepted Najib's word in place of his signature
– and only fell back on this excuse when his own poor election planning
failed to yield him Putrajaya.
Hamid offers some consoling thoughts about Anwar's sincerity and
belief in national reconciliation, but the overall thrust is clear:
Anwar is a man not of his word, but of expedience and a determination
to have power. When he thought he would win, he was willing to agree to
accept the election results. As soon as he lost, his word was without
value.
Malaysia dodged a disaster by avoiding putting this man in Putrajaya. Hamid deserves the rakyat's thanks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment