IF you’re Malaysian, chances are your Facebook timeline and Twitter feed
these days are inundated with election or political content. With
Malaysia going to the polls on May 5 in a general election that some
pundits say may see a change in government for the first time in 56
years, election fever has reached an all-time high in the nation’s
social media space.
Interim Prime Minister Najib Razak has described the 13th
general election (GE13) as Malaysia’s ‘first social media election,’ and
while many have argued that this isn’t strictly true – in the end,
elections are decided at the ballot box – it is undeniable that both
sides of the political divide are using the Internet and social networks
in particular as a serious communications medium in their campaign
strategy.
If such is the case, the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition would seem to
be winning the raw numbers battle, if nothing else. Dr James Gomez,
associate professor at Universiti Utara Malaysia’s School of
International Studies, says that Barisan “has made strong inroads onto
social media and has carved itself a competitive position.”
Gomez notes that Najib’s Facebook page has 1,580,00 ‘Likes.’ Leaders
from the Opposition alliance, Pakatan Rakyat, are trailing. Nik Aziz has
889,000; Anwar Ibrahim has 480,000 and Lim Kit Siang has 120,000.
“The combined numbers of the three (Pakatan) leaders are a good 80,000 likes below Najib,” he noted.
On Twitter, the Opposition fares better. The three parties in Pakatan –
the Pan Malaysia Islamic Party or PAS, the Democratic Action Party (DAP)
and the People’s Justice Party or PKR – have their own individual
accounts. In terms of Twitter followers, PKR has 27,000; DAP 27,000 and
PAS 1,200. Barisan has 24,000, Gomez noted.
At a request from Digital News Asia (DNA), online intelligence solutions
provider Meltwater, using its social media monitoring tools, measured
the online buzz for a short period following the dissolution of
Parliament on April 3 right up to the time the Election Commission met
on April 10 to announce the dates for nomination and actual polling.
Meltwater’s numbers also showed Barisan having a slight edge but with the caveat that social media chatter does not translate to direct votes, and the cautionary note that ‘paid-for’ posts are skewing numbers artificially.
One key takeaway from Meltwater’s monitoring is that most of the
discussions are coming from Twitter instead of blogs, says its marketing
and communications manager for Asia Pacific, Janet Yu.
“This is slightly surprising because in the 2008 election, blogs were
the major communications medium for the Opposition,” she says. “But now,
Twitter has the highest volume.”
Yu also notes that members of the public write more about the Opposition
than they do about Najib. “On average, (Opposition leader) Anwar
Ibrahim has three mentions per minute on Twitter, while the (interim)
prime minister has one mention per minute,” she says.
Yu isn’t sure she would call GE13 Malaysia’s first social media election
either. “The volume of discussion has been pretty consistent since
Parliament was dissolved. We’re looking forward to more discussion as we
get closer to the actual election.”
When asked what role social media is playing or can play in elections,
she notes that “social media has always been a medium that encourages
people to share information and discuss issues. In my opinion, it is
like a real-time public opinion sentiment check on the candidates.
“For this specific election however, it is still too early to draw any conclusion,” she adds.
Yu is also wary of using social media as
a barometer of where the votes are going. “Voters and social media
users may have an age gap, since more young people are on social media
but they may not be at the right age to vote yet.
“We saw a lot of discussion on social media in the US presidential
elections, but social media users do not equal number of voters at the
poll,” she says. “Also, a trending topic on social media about politics
may not refer to the candidates’ political platform and standings.”
The Meltwater figures show Twitter having an overwhelming share of voice
at 81.5%; followed by Facebook at a distant second with 9.7%; blogs at
3.9% and forums at 1.3%. The rules of online political discourse and
campaigning are obviously changing from just a few short years ago, when
blogs ruled the roost.
[Updated information:
It has also been pointed out by some social media experts that Twitter
gets a high share of voice rating because some monitoring tools cannot
trawl Facebook, thanks to the latter's privacy settings. -- ED]
The Twitter edge probably comes from the high penetration of mobile
Internet users in Malaysia, says Yu, and the ease of sharing content on
the micro-blogging service.
“The fact that it is limited to 140 characters has encouraged a low barrier to entry,” she says.
This does not mean political parties should pour all their resources
into Twitter only. As Yu notes, “forums will appeal to people with
similar interests; while blogs are good for thought leadership,
particularly for political leaders.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment