Monday, November 3, 2008

Umno Is Not Sacred, Should Be Open To Criticism, Says Mukhriz

BALING, Nov 2 (Bernama) -- Umno members must stop regarding Umno as a sacred party that it cannot be criticised and reformed, said Jerlun member of parliament Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir.
"If the members still think that Umno is a party that cannot change, then the party cannot prevail and will be destroyed sooner or later.
"As a result of certain factors due to weaknesses in the party, Umno is now being challenged from within and outside, and its future will depend on the courage of party members to reform it with a new model," he said at a forum on "Muslim Malay Politics: Conflict and Resolution", organised by the Baling Umno division, here today.
He said Umno members must be brave to effect change if they regarded Umno as the bastion of the struggle of the Malays.
Mukhriz said in a situation where Umno was seen as rather weak, the other Barisan Nasional component parties started issuing threats, and raising and questioning various matters.
Meanwhile, Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar in his speech, said the stern action taken against the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) was in the interest of national security.
He said such action had also been taken against the Al Arqam movement and when it was banned, the Malays however did not react as the Hindraf supporters had.
Syed Hamid said the Internal Security Act was not used indiscriminately as alleged by some quarters, but under certain circumstances to safeguard national security.

tunku : any party should be open to criticism and its leaders. if they can't be criticized then they think they are always right. we have to tell them when they are wrong and they must listen.if they don't listen,we throw them out.we have seen a couple of years ago where umno and its leaders can't be criticized at all and we have seen the consequences of it during the march 08 election. the criticism must be a constructive criticism, we must be fair to them too.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

mukhriz said that UMNO must willing to accept crtitism.but how about the time when his dad was the head for UMNO?

Mahathir was reluctant to accept other people critism towards him.he counterattack to those anyone that opposed him.

even the media aren't too free to voice out their opinions not unlike now.

. said...

saya setuju dengan pandangan tersebut. ahli umno mesti membuang budaya mengampu dan beralih kepada berani mengkritik. kritik sistem, kritik budaya, malah kritik pemimpin dalam parti, termasuklah presiden parti. biar ahli2 umno menegur pemimpin sendiri daripada membiarkan orang luar membuat tohmahan.

Anonymous said...

q33ny,
saya rasa elok saudara/ri mencari balik fakta sebelum membuat komen.mahathir lebih open dari pak lah, dan mahathir juga ditentang dan dicabar.pak lah mana ada bagi semua tu.lagi satu, jgn samakan anak dgn bapak.bapak lain style, anak lain style, ada fahammmmmmm.

Anonymous said...

owh.Mahathir lagi open dari Abdullah?.apa cuba pergi di link di bawah ini dan baca komen pemilik blog tersebut terhadap Abdullah dan Mahathir.Abdulllah is slightly better than Mahathir.

Comparative Ratings: Mahathir, Abdullah, Najib

Anonymous said...

Mahathir lagi open daripada pak lah? Buta warna ke apa ni? Jangan buat lawak lah wei. Tak tengok ke dulu orang sampai tak berani bersuara dengan Mahathir ni. Orang dalam UMNO semua tak berani nak bersuara. Jangan buat lawak badut.

Anonymous said...

q33ny
utk pembangkang memang la mereka suka pak lah, sebab pak lah membuatkan mereka menang bergaya(KERANA PAK LAH).jadi tak payahlah nak bg link pembangkang kat sini.pak lah memang dangkal.

tunkujuh,
biar buta warna dari buta hati mcm pak lah dan sewaktu dgnnya.kalau time mahathir tak berani org bersuara, tak dak la yg lawan dgnnya.apa lah.