Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Fundamentalist Begin Defending Againts Liberals’ Onslaugth

PAS youth is trying to pin down DAP for trying to get PAS dissolved through the suggestion that the government deregister political parties and NGOs that are race and religious base.

The Islamist party youth deputy vice chief Dr Raja Ahmad Iskandar Raja Yaakob had demanded DAP chairman Karpal Singh to retract and apologise for his statements on the subject which Karpal denied having made.

In the midst of the ‘tug-of-war’ between the two parties, a blogger Helen Ang had posted the whole interview which she got and it was clear that Karpal had said the dissolution should include PAS, a religious-based party.

And on Sunday, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, in closing the Selangor PAS convention in Petaling Jaya called on party members not to ‘dance to the music played by oppositions media (Barisan Nasional).’

With the party election scheduled for Friday where the veteran fundamentalists are facing an onslaught from the liberals associated with Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) de facto chief Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, the fundamentalists have been walking a tightrope balancing between holding on to the leadership and continuing the party’s struggle or losing the leadership and allow the party play second fiddle in the political co-operation in Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

The two factions have been locking horns on many things but they always put up a united front so as to convince followers and supporters and the public that the Islamist party is united and have one goal which in reality is the opposite.

The fundamentalists are adamant that the party should go alone with just political co-operation and not a pact where the party has had to compromise on so many principles and placed in an awkward position.
The friction has however surfaced when issues involved got more sensitive where they touched the very principles and pillars of Islam and this has got the two factions can no longer hide their disagreement which then led to ‘media war’.

Besides that issues, the fundamentalists are also getting ‘tired’ of the loose alliance in PR where the party has target become the target of attack whenever the pact face setbacks such as the recent general election where PAS was blamed for the under performance.

And the fundamentalists, under attack in the Friday election, began their defence by highlighting their achievements – Hudud Laws in Kelantan – and a proposal for debate where Hudud laws should be implemented in PR held states.

The subject will probably trigger a ‘feud’ between the liberals and fundamentalists where the invisible writings are already on the wall – if fundamentalists win, the party may cut ties with PR and if liberals win, the party will be one of PR’s close alliance.

Phantom Branches in the DAP’s CEC re-election?

Looking at DAP’s suspicious action in governing their own party, it is not shocking to know why the party “promoted” the phantom voters issue to the people of Malaysia in the last general election. Apparently, “phantom voters” were actually a usual strategy that is used by the DAP to set up their own leaders in the party.

This has been proven as those who were fired prior to the party’s election are given the permission to vote in the CEC re-election that was held on the 29th of September 2013.

Other than that, their accusation that SPR is not transparent comes from their own character from the party strategy whose doesn’t care in the transparency in the party’s election.

We can say that what the DAP accused BN of doing is actually what has already been practiced by them all along.

Ridiculous as it may seems, there are non-existent branches that sent their delegates, to vote in the last CEC. This particular incident was brought up by the Assistant Secretary of DAP Taman Seri Sungai Pelek Branch who was comparing the numbers of branches that was involve in the first election is not the same as in the second one.

In the earlier election, there were 865 braches who were eligible to attend, however in the latest election there were 985 branches involved. The existence of the additional 120 branches is still being investigated by DAP party members themselves.

Other than that, the DAP didn’t even show their full list of the 2,576 delegates who were eligible to attend, and also they need to explain why only 1,756 delegates were given notice for the re-election.
There are more branches but the delegates are fewer, this shows that they are definitely using dirty tricks to elude their own party members, thinking that the re-election was clean as a whistle.

Even though this particular incident was stated loudly and ongoing investigation is done by their members, the DAP still takes a “no comment” stand up till today. They need to answer to their members on why such action was made on behalf of the leaders of the DAP.

From their “no comment” stand, we know that they are planning something that is against the law, or even their own party constitution to ensure that their partiy leaders will not be prosecuted by any means.

We believe that it is impossible for the DAP to let it go even though many of their members complaints and made police reports regarding the matter. When will DAP stop all this dirty tactics and tries to cover up their problems by using gangster’s tactics. If DAP is really serious to be the leader and not just a bunch of rebels and traitors then the party must obey the constitution and the law.

They are willing to sacrifice their own constitution and laws just so that they can achieve their lifelong dream of conquering the country, what is left for their members to hold on?

Monday, November 18, 2013

PAS Poll Result On Nov 22 Determines Party Future In PR

The result of PAS election on Nov 22 will determine whether the party will leave the opposition pact Pakatan Rakyat (PR) and work together with Barisan Nasional (BN) under a unity government.
This if the fundamentalists win but if liberals win, then the party will remain in PR and will probably play second fiddle to Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and DAP.

The clear battle lines and the long term impact from the result of whichever faction wins, according to some party insiders, will create a new political landscape in Malay politics that will affect Umno and the Malays.

They said the reason why PAS information chief Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man opted out of the deputy president race and contest on of the three vice-president posts was due to the higher probability of winning.

The battle line is deeper than what is seen on the surface given the party’s future political path depends on which faction wins.

The fundamentalists, according for some party members wanted PAS to remain an Islamist party with its prime objective of setting up an Islamic state and implement the Hudud with non-Muslims as associate members, meaning support the party’s Islamic struggles.

The liberals, they said are more interested in becoming the government as fast as possible with the party’s objectives becoming a second priority, meaning they would work with anybody party that they assure them of victory in future the general elections.

Given the clear line of each faction’s priority, the fundamentalist has put up Kelantan Deputy Mentri Besar Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah against incumbent Mohamad Sabu or Mat Sabu for deputy president.

“Earlier Tuan Ibrahim had also wanted to contest the deputy president but the fundamentalists advised him to go for vice-president since Datuk Amar seems to stand a better chance against Mat Sabu.

“For vice-president, Tuan Ibrahim is seen as an acceptable candidate for delegates given his wide exposure as the party information chief where he has been meeting party grassroots for the past several years all over the country,” said one of the party members.

Among the three incumbent vice-presidents, they said Sallehuddin Ayub is the most vulnerable since he had lost two seats in the general election when he contested the Pulai Parliamentary seat and Nusajaya state seat in Johor.

“The other two – Datuk Husam Musa and Datuk Mahfuz Omar – won Salor state seat in Kelantan and Pokok Sena Parliament seat in Kedah respectively.

“Thus, the fundamentalists may see the party future path not derailed as Mohd Amar is considered a better candidate than Mat Sabu by the grassroots for deputy president plus one fundamentalist among the three vice-presidents,” said one of them.

Issues involved in the campaign mainly centre on economic development in Kelantan, PAS held state where a unity government with BN would see the state developed and flourished and the pact in PR.
“This two issues see a real split in thoughts between the two factions and the outcome of the party election will see whether the party will stay in PR or work with BN,” said another party insider.

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Fundamentalist Losing Grip In PAS Coming Poll

The fundamentalists hold in PAS is fast slipping away as the liberals who are young and professional have succeeded in offering the party members better ‘deal’ that can pave the way for the party to ‘sit at Putrajaya’.

In the upcoming PAS election, the liberals have positioned themselves strategically at every level of the party hierarchy where the fundamentalists are at the ‘losing end’.

Campaigns for the party poll are free for all which give the liberals more opportunities given their mobility compared to the fundamentalists who stick to their old method of giving religious ceramahs rather than giving out views on the future of the party.

Being professionals and equipped with political knowledge and the knowing aspirations of party members, the liberals clearly have an upper hand in the campaigns which further push the fundamentalists behind in the race.

Sixty-on candidates are vying for the 18 central committee posts where nearly three-quarter are professionals and liberals, those who subscribed to re-branding PAS to a Malay-based Islamic party than the present Islamic-based party.

Given the 1,500-odd delegates this time around comprising nearly half professionals and businessmen, the liberals may spring a surprise with the likely probability that incumbent deputy president Mohamad Sabu or Mat Sabu may retain his seat against fundamentalist Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah.

Similarly, the three incumbent vice-presidents – Datuk Mahfuz Omar, Datuk Husam Musa and Salahuddin Ayub – may just continue their term against fundamentalists Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man and Datuk Abu Bakar Chik.

The fundamentalists have had their time in projecting and promoting Islamic concepts such as the setting up of an Islamic state and the implementation of Hudud to fulfill the religious obligations but until present time, the party has yet to get the goals achieved.

Except for holding on the Kelantan state government that saw a decline in influence at the May 5 general election, the fundamentalists ‘authority’ has been challenged by liberals such as Salor assemblyman in Kelantan Husam, who is known to be a very close associate of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) de facto chief Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Husam’s new approach with PAS director of strategy Dr Zulkifli Ahmad, also known to be Anwar’s close associate and a few others, are now being accepted by party members as their approached seemed practical for the party to ‘move to Putrajaya’.

Forgetting the sensitivities involved in the volatile relationship in Pakatan Rakyat (PR) where the liberals ‘walk the tightrope and survive’ on issues involving Islam, their appearances more elegant and way they talk more convincing especially with their intellectualism.

In fact, the liberals have been actively involved in the party campaigns in two by-elections – Kuala Besut state seat in Terengganu and the recently concluded Sungai Limau state seat in Kedah – had even predicted the outcome of the two nearly correctly.

Except not heavily involved in the campaign strategy as they always ‘respect the fundamentalists way’ and also not to create any animosity among the factions, these liberals have been filing details on the party weaknesses and good points for future references.

In fact, their approach and style are modern and up-to-date which impress the young members more than anything else.

Compared to the fundamentalists who wear the skull cap and most times in sarungs whose talks are mostly on religious laws rather than intellectual reasoning, the faction led by non-other than the party president himself Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang seems to lose credibility and influence among the younger party members.

Given such background, the fundamentalists need more than just religious talks and issues to counter the advance of the liberals come Nov 22 when delegates cast their votes.

Shafee: No plot against AG Gani Patail

Senior lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah has denied a plot was made against Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail at an alleged high-level meeting at Dr Mahathir Mohamad's residence three months ago.

Former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim had made this allegation recently in a statutory declaration (SD).

Shafee said there was no reason for that and Mahathir was never involved in any way.
“Irrespective of what is contained in the SD, there is no such thing as a plot or conspiracy against the AG.

"There is no reason to do that, either on the issue of the black-eye incident or the issue of the Pulau Batu Puteh case," the senior lawyer said.
Furthermore, the senior lawyer said there was no purpose to discuss the Pulau Batu Puteh matter with Mat Zain, as he was only a former police officer and not an international lawyer.

“Why should anybody be discussing with him on that regarding the issue,” he said.

However, Shafee confirmed his presence at former prime minister Mahathir's residence on Aug 10, three days after Hari Raya.

He did not want to confirm the presence of others, he said, until he had read former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain Ibrahim's statutory declaration, saying it would be unfair to the former police officer to do so.

This was also to be fair to Mahathir.
"Tun (Mahathir) is certainly not involved in all this rubbish. It was I who wanted to pay my respects to Tun. There were others who wanted to do the same," Shafee said.
The senior lawyer had just returned to the country after seeking treatment overseas. He was met on the sidelines of Anwar Ibrahim's appeal to bar him from acting for the prosecution in his Sodomy II trial.

Contextually, Shafee alleged what he read in Malaysiakini's report is totally wrong.

“But how wrong it is, I want to be fair with Mat Zain - I want to talk to him, as I just got back from medical leave overseas.”

He added that he would hold a press conference, possibly tomorrow, after he gets a full copy of Mat Zain's statutory declaration.
'No-holds-barred press conference'

Shafee said for some strange reason, the maker of the SD as well as the people who have the SD are not making it available to him.

“I cannot tell you with precision as I have not seen the SD. I do not want to be guessing. What Malaysiakini prints or The Malaysian Insider prints maybe a misquotation of the SD, and I want to rebut.”

“If I receive the SD today, I will call for a press conference tomorrow... to make certain corrections, to certain things - if they are true - as stated in the press.

“I do not know if (the report) is accurately reflective of the SD. That is why I want to see the SD, to be fair to him,” Shafee said, adding that he would answer everything. He promised a “no holds barred” press conference where he will answer as much he can.

Asked what had transpired at the meeting, Shafee also suggested that the media was not being fair in seeking his comments without giving him a copy of the SD.

“I do not want to comment now because I do not know what Mat Zain said. If some of you have the SD but you were told not to give it to me... shouldn't freedom of information be for everybody?

“Mat Zain cited names, shouldn’t a copy be given to Tun, a copy to me, or (former Commercial Crime Investigation Department director) Ramli Yusuff and also (Mahathir’s former political secretary) Matthias (Chang),” he asked.

How is he to answer or verify what is correct and what is wrong without looking at the SD, Shafee asked.

Mat Zain had said he made his SD detailing what had transpired during the meeting at Shafee’s house and then at Mahathir’s house.

Monday, November 11, 2013

PAS Poll – Clear Battle Between Fundamentalist and Liberals For No 2 And VPs

The lines are drawn between the fundamentalists and liberals or popularly known as the Erdogans in the upcoming PAS election as the final list of contestants finalized and ready to go.

The deputy president post sees incumbent Mohamad Sabu or Mat Sabu being challenged by Kelantan Deputy Mentri Besar Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah – a clear cut one-to-one battle that see which way the party is going in the future depending on who wins.

Similar battle line is also seen for the vice-president posts where the three incumbents Datuk Husam Musa, Datuk Mahfuz Omar and Sallehuddin Ayud being challenged by fundamentalist party information chief Datuk Tuan Ibrhaim Tuan Man and  Ulamak council member Abu Bakar Chik.

The party has been split between the veteran fundamentalists and liberals the past decade with each faction pulling the party the way each wanted to the extent that party members are equally split to each fraction.
The veteran fundamentalists have been helming the party based on its struggle in championing Islam with the objective of setting up an Islamic state and implementation of Hudud while the liberals are more interested in winning the general election and helm Putrajaya.

The Islamic party has been working together with DAP since the 80s in every general election but their co-operation has always been on the surface – fielding candidates on constituencies based on racial majority where each did not question the other’s philosophy and concept.

However, the party was put in a fragile situation when Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) came into being, where the party has been put to test on several basic principles which saw the party in awkward positions at times.
In doing so, the party leadership has been ‘playing tug-of-war’ with the liberals supporting the PKR and DAP on several sensitive issues regarding Islam while the fundamentalists veterans continue with their stand, opposing the statements made by the liberals.

However, the ‘splitting of hairs and difference in opinions’ is expected to end with the upcoming party polls as both factions have put up their men where party delegates will have to decide for once who they want to lead the party.

As the party president’s post is unchallenged where incumbent Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang won uncontested, the deputy president and three vice-presidents posts are now the focus for delegates to determine which faction should steer the party future path.

Incumbent deputy president Mat Sabu is known to be aligned to PKR de facto chief Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and being tagged a liberal, he is facing a veteran fundamentalist Mohd Amar who had gone against Mat Sabu and Husam in wanting the party members to support Anwar’s rally dubbed the Black Out 505 in May.

The contest is a straight liberal versus fundamentalist with no holds barred which will give the 2,000-odd delegates a clear cut ‘who’s who to vote for’.

For vice-presidents, the three incumbents are up against two fundamentalists who delegates knew all of them well and what they have been struggling for and how thye have contributed to the party.

However, this coming party election is no ‘walk on the park event’ for delegates as the lines and pictures are clear that it is between the liberals and fundamentalists which will dictate the future path of the party.

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Sabah PKR The Dying Dream

When a democratic country does not practice freedom of speech, citizens protest. What happens when a political party that espouses democratic principles goes against that which it advocates? Members resign! This is the scenario in Sabah PKR where its members have come to grips with its dying dream of ever taking over the state. The resignation of Kadamaian PKR assemblyman Jeremy Malajad to become an Independent on November 4th 2013 heralds the exodus of more disgruntled PKR members.

Pragmatic and visionary, Jeremy Malajad recognized that Barisan's victory in more than two-thirds of the 60 state constituencies is a barometer of the people's confidence in the coalition. Smart and people-centred,  Jeremy put the needs of the constituents first  far beyond his own political ambition. Upon realization that PKR can never expedite improvements and positive changes, including the provision of basic amenities such as roads, water supply and rural clinics, he quit!

To add insult to injury, Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) leaders lambasted PKR Sabah chairman Datuk Seri Panglima Lajim Hj Ukin for asking Kadamaian assemblyman Jeremy Malajad to vacate Kadamaian seat when Lajim himself did not resign from the seats he held when he left PBS and Umno. This is the height of hypocrisy and double standards for Sabahans well-known trademarks of PKR.

Today, Matunggong assemblyman Datuk Jelani Hamdan announced his resignation as the PKR Sabah vice chairman with immediate effect. He said he could no longer work with the party State chief Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin and threw in the towel when Anwar called him garang (fierce) and  branded him a traitor for voicing his criticisms. PKR Vice-President Tian Chua has threatened to issue a show-cause letter for criticizing the party.

Clearly, PKR leaders do not practice what they preach. When they are not happy with the ruling government, they can hold protests, issue strongly worded statements and the sky seems to be the limit for their grouses. However, when their own members provide positive criticism, it is show-cause letter time! This is demoracy for you PKR style!

These two developments leave a big gap in representation as the Kadazandusun Murut and Rungus communities are being sidelined in the party.

What Sabahans see is the dying dream of PKR smoldering in the ashes. Do not forget the cracks in Sabah's elected opposition began cracking on September 27 after DAP's Hiew King Cheu of Luyang quit the party and declared himself an independent. More are expected to quit.

Wise up, Sabahans! Put your trust in PKR to your detriment. BN is surely the way to go

 By Datuk Huan Cheng Guan

Friday, November 8, 2013

PAS Deputy President Post Contest Will See The Party Future Direction

PAS election on Nov 22 will see a clash between the fundamentalist group and the liberals at the deputy president level as the fundamentalist strive to sustain its power and the liberals scramble to untie the knots of fundamentalism.

Incumbent Datuk Mohamad Sabu or popularly known as Mat Sabu is expected to crumble under the onslaught of fellow liberal Datuk Husam Musa and fundamentalist Kelantan Deputy Mentri Besar Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah.

The outcome of the election will dictate which direction the party will take – liberalism with the original party struggle in upholding Islamic cause and setting up an Islamic state come second or fundamentalism with relationship with DAP and Parti keadilan Rakyat (PKR) reviewed.

For PKR de facto chief Datuk Seri Anwar brahim, he would wish the liberals win the deputy presidency where he can then have control on the path of the Islamic party.

Mat Sabu and Husam are with the liberals while Tuan Ibrahim and Mohd Amar are from the fundamentalists, both sides throwing their best candidates for the 2,000-odd delegates to the party assembly to choose.
Husam is trying hard to win the post as his ‘political life’ in Kelantan is as good as over when he was not picked as an exco member in the state and following which his followers had staged a demonstration against the Mentri Besar.

Few months later, Husam had questioned the performance of state related companies which then created a row between him and the fundamentalists who are govern the state.

This election is a do or die battle for Husam because a lost will put him in political oblivion and a win will put him in a much better position to further strengthen PAS relationship with PKR.

It is understood that this time around, the party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, who have been declared unopposed, would not appoint Husam to the central committee given the sour ties between him (husam) and other leaders in the party (who are the fundamentalist).

Mohd Amar had been at loggerheads with the liberals particularly Husam and other liberals on issues concerning the party ideology which the fundamentalists have been defending while the liberals have been compromising.

The issues included the use of word Allah and the latest DAP Karpal Singh’s call for the government to abolish all political race-based and religious-based parties and NGOs which included PAS.

Moreover, the party ties with PKR and DAP has not been smooth and cosy as issues concerning Islam have been on the rise lately which created frictions between DAP and PAS fundamentalists but not the liberals in PAS who did not ‘utter a word’ when those issues cropped up.

This has created further rift between the fundamentalists and liberals in the party.
Given the situation, the deputy president’s post is expected to be the focus and hotly contested post on Nov 22 as delegates decide whether to go liberal or fundamentals.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

The One Who Initiated May 13 Was Not From A Religious or Racial Based Party



DAP has long accuse UMNO of being racist because they do not open their membership to all races. This particular accusation is being enforced as hard as they can to create a perception that UMNO is evil and unjust.

UMNO has cooperated with MCA and MIC which are Chinese and Indians and has created a movement under the party called Barisan Nasional. With this particular action, each and every race has a leader or President that has a power to voice out the needs of each and every race themselves without being left out.

Different with the DAP who has members from all the races in Malaysia but their leaders is from the same race which is Chinese, other races has no platform to voice out their opinion.

Not just that, the non-Chinese in the DAP were abused and do not have any way to challenge the leadership as what has been enjoyed by the MCA and MIC with other BN component parties in Sabah and Sarawak in making any decision with the vision and mission of the country.

Today, the DAP is also inciting religious issues where they are attacking their own ally, PAS. According to Karpal Singh, a party which is based on racial or religious indoctrination are dangerous to the country.
  
We know that the DAP wants to change the history of this nation, but we don’t believe that Karpal has forgotten the history of this country. PAS has been established since 1951, MCA in 1949, while MIC is in 1946 the same year as UMNO. This means that parties based on racial and religion has long been accepted in this country.

Since then, except for PAS, UMNO, MCA and MIC has created harmony and tolerance and not destruction for this nation.

The spirit of toleration brought by UMNO, MCA and MIC are not shared by the likes of DAP.

DAP has created racial tension in 13 May 1969 with their racist agenda. DAP and also Gerakan at that time was two parties that was created as a non-racial political entity, they ridiculed the Malays and call for the Malays to go back to the jungle. They say that this country is owned by the Chinese and will be led by the DAP a party that has long taken pride as a party who practices non-racial politics.

In the tension, UMNO leaders were the one who stood up and try to repair the damaged made by the DAP. UMNO leaders were the one who came and restore peace and unity with the help of MCA and MIC. All three of the racially based parties became an agent of harmony that is continued till today.


Meanwhile, a non-racial based party like the DAP are trying as hard as they can to create tension in any way. In this era of information technology, social websites are used fully by DAP supporters to provoke Muslims Malays. It is fortunate that the government led by UMNO is mature and wise enough to delegate the situation and avoid any hostile confrontation.

It is clear that the most important thing is not the name or the constitution of the party, but who led the party is the real importance. If the leader is a racist than their party will be a racist party even though it is open for all. If the leader is a not a racist, then he will be just to all even if his party is for only one race.


Karpal Singh is not as bright as we think for not able to analyse this particular fact. That is what happens when you refuse to study and learn from history.


Rebellious PKR rep says “Anwar is not god”

A defiant Matunggong assemblyman Datuk Jelani Hamdan appears to be burning his bridges with the leadership of PKR, strengthening expectations of his imminent departure from the party.

In his Facebook postings over the past several days, Jelani accused PKR leaders of ''practicing laws of the jungle'' over their intention to issue him a show cause letter following his public grouses about them.
In the Feb 5 posting titled "Over reacted and prejudged" he said PKR leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was "not God" and he should be prepared to face criticisms.

"Anwar has called me garang (fierce). When I voice my opinions, I am also branded a traitor. Since when are we banned from criticising Anwar. He is not God,'' he added.

And on Sabah PKR chief Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin, who ditched Umno for PKR before the May 5 general election, Jelani said sarcastically: ''Mr Perfect and Clean. Cannot be criticised. My foot," closing the sentence with a smiley emoticon.

He said his main grouses with the PKR leadership were the appointment of Lajim as the Sabah assembly opposition leader and as Sabah PKR chief.

He also said there was a "lack" of Kadazandusun Murut and Rungus representation in the party's state liaison committee.

Jelani said he had brought up these issues to the PKR leadership before but "a decision is different from the implementation."

On PKR vice president Tian Chua's statement that the party would be issuing a show cause letter to him for his criticisms against the party leadership, he said: "What the hell are they doing? They are practicing jungle law or are they jungle people!!!"

In a reply to a Facebook friend on his posting, Jelani said it appeared that the PKR leadership was trying to get him to resign from the party or face a sacking by issuing him the show cause letter.
''They are trying to give a me choice. Madu di tangan kanan mu, racun di tangan kiri mu (honey is your right hand and poison in your left hand)," he said.

Anticipation of Jelani quitting the party had been growing since his Kadamaian counterpart Jeremy Malajad's departure from PKR on Monday.

Jeremy along with PKR state assemblyman Jelani Hamdan of Matunggong had been widely expected to quit the party after their absence from  a meeting with party chief Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim here last weekend.
When contacted, Jelani told The Star: ‘’I have not reached that point as yet. However I am not ruling out the possibility of leaving the party.”

He said  he did not attend the Sabah PKR liaison meeting with Anwar on Saturday as he and Jeremy saw no point in attending it.

‘’We cannot work with Lajim anymore,” he said.

He said Anwar and Lajim had ignored their repeated calls for better representation of the Kadazandusun-Rungus communities in the state PKR liaison line-up.

Sabah’s elected opposition ranks in the State Assembly began cracking on September 27 after DAP’s Hiew King Cheu of Luyang quit the party and declared himself an independent.

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Apologise, PAS Youth tells Karpal over 'de-register' call

PAS Youth wants DAP chairman Karpal Singh to retract and apologise publicly to PAS over his call for the de-registration of all associations that operate along racial and religious lines, including PAS.
"We, from Federal Territories PAS, hope that Karpal retracts his statement and makes a public apology, especially to PAS. We do not want to jeapordise our relations in Pakatan Rakyat," said its Youth chief Kamaruzaman Mohamad in a statement Wednesday.

Kamaruzaman, who is also PAS Youth deputy information chief, said Karpal should not equate PAS to other race or religion-based political or professional bodies.

"One bad apple spoils the barrel. This idiom can aptly describe the DAP chairman's statement. PAS, being the only religious-based political party left, is inevitably being implicated in this," he added.
Karpal, a long-term Bukit Gelugor MP, on Tuesday lashed out at the Muslim Laywers Association (MLA) for warning the Bar Council against supporting for Catholic weekly The Herald. He said such associations should be de-registered.

The veteran lawyer also called for the de-registration of all political or professional bodies which operate along racial and religious lines, saying that the move would work in the interest of unity.
"This applies to all parties, including PAS, unfortunately," he was quoted saying.

Earlier Wednesday, PAS information chief Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man also hit out at Karpal, describing the statement as "serious, dangerous and unfounded".
"PAS is very disappointed with this baseless statement which seems to show that he (Karpal) has failed to understand PAS' struggle," he said in a statement.

"What is the danger of PAS to multi-racial Malaysia?" he asked, adding that the party should be judged based on its track record as a state government.

"The people should evaluate for themselves how PAS has ruled Kelantan for over 23 years, Terengganu in 1999 and Kedah in 2008 and how it promoted unity and protected the rights of Muslims and non-Muslims. Were there any non-Muslims sidelined?" asked Tuan Ibrahim.
He said the statement should not be coming from a Pakatan leader at a time when the public was beginning to have faith in the Opposition.

"Karpal should have been more wise and not come out with a statement that could affect the good relations in Pakatan and the people's support.
"This type of statement also does not benefit DAP," he said, adding that he would leave it to DAP to take action against Karpal over the statement.

Karpal's call also drew criticism from other non-governmental organisations, such as Jaringan Melayu Malaysia (JMM), whose objectives are to fight for Malay rights.
Its president Azwanddin Hamzah said Karpal was kurang ajar (insolent) and no longer respected the majority of the country.

"He should apologise publicly to us because he has no right to interfere in the business of such organisations like ours.

"If he did that, we could also interfere in DAP's business by calling the de-registration of the party," he said.

Monday, November 4, 2013

History of Hijrah: Migration for Peace and Justice. SALAM MAAL HIJRAH


After Muhammad SAW had preached publicly for more than a decade, the opposition to him reached such a high pitch that, fearful for their safety, he sent some of his adherents to Ethiopia, where the Christian ruler extended protection to them, the memory of which has been cherished by Muslims ever since. But in Mecca the persecution worsened. Muhammad's SAW followers were harassed, abused, and even tortured. At last, therefore, Muhammad SAW sent seventy of his followers off to the northern town of Yathrib, which was later to be renamed Medina ("The City"). Later, in the early fall of 622, he learned of a plot to murder him and, with his closest friend, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, set off to join the emigrants.

In Mecca the plotters arrived at Muhammad's SAW home to find that his cousin, 'Ali, had taken his place in bed. Enraged, the Meccans set a price on Muhammad's SAW  head and set off in pursuit. Muhammad SAW and Abu Bakr, however, had taken refuge in a cave where, as they hid from their pursuers, a spider spun its web across the cave's mouth. When they saw that the web was unbroken, the Meccans passed by and Muhammad SAW and Abu Bakr went on to Medina, where they were joyously welcomed by a throng of Medinans as well as the Meccans who had gone ahead to prepare the way.

This was the Hijrah - anglicized as Hegira - usually, but inaccurately, translated as "Flight" - from which the Muslim era is dated. In fact, the Hijrah was not a flight but a carefully planned migration which marks not only a break in history - the beginning of the Islamic era- but also, for Muhammad SAW  and the Muslims, a new way of life. Henceforth, the organizational principle of the community was not to be mere blood kinship, but the greater brotherhood of all Muslims. The men who accompanied Muhammad SAW on the Hijrah were called the Muhajirun - "those that made the Hijrah" or the "Emigrants" - while those in Medina who became Muslims were called the Ansar or "Helpers."

Muhammad SAW was well acquainted with the situation in Medina. Earlier, before the Hijrah, the city had sent envoys to Mecca asking Muhammad SAW to mediate a dispute between two powerful tribes. What the envoys saw and heard had impressed them and they had invited Muhammad SAW to settle in Medina. After the Hijrah, Muhammad's SAW exceptional qualities so impressed the Medinans that the rival tribes and their allies temporarily closed ranks as, on March 15, 624, Muhammad SAW and his supporters moved against the pagans of Mecca. 


The first battle, which took place near Badr, now a small town southwest of Medina, had several important effects. In the first place, the Muslim forces, outnumbered three to one, routed the Meccans. Secondly, the discipline displayed by the Muslims brought home to the Meccans, perhaps for the first time, the abilities of the man they had driven from their city. Thirdly, one of the allied tribes which had pledged support to the Muslims in the Battle of Badr, but had then proved lukewarm when the fighting started, was expelled from Medina one month after the battle. Those who claimed to be allies of the Muslims, but tacitly opposed them, were thus served warning: membership in the community imposed the obligation of total support.

A year later the Meccans struck back. Assembling an army of three thousand men, they met the Muslims at Uhud, a ridge outside Medina. After an initial success the Muslims were driven back and the Prophet himself was wounded. As the Muslims were not completely defeated, the Meccans, with an army of ten thousand, attacked Medina again two years later but with quite different results. At the Battle of the Trench, also known as the Battle of the Confederates, the Muslims scored a signal victory by introducing a new defense. On the side of Medina from which attack was expected they dug a trench too deep for the Meccan cavalry to clear without exposing itself to the archers posted behind earthworks on the Medina side. After an inconclusive siege, the Meccans were forced to retire. Thereafter Medina was entirely in the hands of the Muslims. 

The Constitution of Medina - under which the clans accepting Muhammad SAW as the Prophet of God formed an alliance, or federation - dates from this period. It showed that the political consciousness of the Muslim community had reached an important point; its members defined themselves as a community separate from all others. The Constitution also defined the role of non-Muslims in the community. Jews, for example, were part of the community; they were dhimmis, that is, protected people, as long as they conformed to its laws. This established a precedent for the treatment of subject peoples during the later conquests. Christians and Jews, upon payment of a yearly tax, were allowed religious freedom and, while maintaining their status as non-Muslims, were associate members of the Muslim state. This status did not apply to polytheists, who could not be tolerated within a community that worshipped the One God. 
Ibn Ishaq, one of the earliest biographers of the Prophet, says it was at about this time that Muhammad SAW sent letters to the rulers of the earth - the King of Persia, the Emperor of Byzantium, the Negus of Abyssinia, and the Governor of Egypt among others - inviting them to submit to Islam. Nothing more fully illustrates the confidence of the small community, as its military power, despite the battle of the Trench, was still negligible. But its confidence was not misplaced. Muhammad SAW so effectively built up a series of alliances among the tribes his early years with the Bedouins must have stood him in good stead here- that by 628 he and fifteen hundred followers were able to demand access to the Ka'bah during negotiations with the Meccans. This was a milestone in the history of the Muslims. Just a short time before, Muhammad SAW had to leave the city of his birth in fear of his life. Now he was being treated by his former enemies as a leader in his own right. A year later, in 629, he reentered and, in effect, conquered Mecca without bloodshed and in a spirit of tolerance which established an ideal for future conquests. He also destroyed the idols in the Ka'bah, to put an end forever to pagan practices there. At the same time Muhammad SAW won the allegiance of 'Amr ibn al-'As, the future conqueror of Egypt, and Khalid ibn al-Walid, the future "Sword of God," both of whom embraced Islam and joined Muhammad SAW . Their conversion was especially noteworthy because these men had been among Muhammad's SAW bitterest opponents only a short time before. 
In one sense Muhammad's SAW return to Mecca was the climax of his mission. In 632, just three years later, he was suddenly taken ill and on June 8 of that year, with his third wife 'Aishah in attendance, the Messenger of God "died with the heat of noon." 

The death of Muhammad SAW was a profound loss. To his followers this simple man from Mecca was far more than a beloved friend, far more than a gifted administrator, far more than the revered leader who had forged a new state from clusters of warring tribes. Muhammad SAW was also the exemplar of the teachings he had brought them from God: the teachings of the Quran, which, for centuries, have guided the thought and action, the faith and conduct, of innumerable men and women, and which ushered in a distinctive era in the history of mankind. His death, nevertheless, had little effect on the dynamic society he had created in Arabia, and no effect at all on his central mission: to transmit the Quran to the world. As Abu Bakr put it: "Whoever worshipped Muhammad SAW , let him know that Muhammad SAW is dead, but whoever worshipped God, let him know that God lives and dies not." 

After Muhammad had preached publicly for more than a decade, the opposition to him reached such a high pitch that, fearful for their safety, he sent some of his adherents to Ethiopia, where the Christian ruler extended protection to them, the memory of which has been cherished by Muslims ever since. But in Mecca the persecution worsened. Muhammad's followers were harassed, abused, and even tortured. At last, therefore, Muhammad sent seventy of his followers off to the northern town of Yathrib, which was later to be renamed Medina ("The City"). Later, in the early fall of 622, he learned of a plot to murder him and, with his closest friend, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, set off to join the emigrants.

In Mecca the plotters arrived at Muhammad's home to find that his cousin, 'Ali, had taken his place in bed. Enraged, the Meccans set a price on Muhammad's head and set off in pursuit. Muhammad and Abu Bakr, however, had taken refuge in a cave where, as they hid from their pursuers, a spider spun its web across the cave's mouth. When they saw that the web was unbroken, the Meccans passed by and Muhammad and Abu Bakr went on to Medina, where they were joyously welcomed by a throng of Medinans as well as the Meccans who had gone ahead to prepare the way.

This was the Hijrah - anglicized as Hegira - usually, but inaccurately, translated as "Flight" - from which the Muslim era is dated. In fact, the Hijrah was not a flight but a carefully planned migration which marks not only a break in history - the beginning of the Islamic era- but also, for Muhammad and the Muslims, a new way of life. Henceforth, the organizational principle of the community was not to be mere blood kinship, but the greater brotherhood of all Muslims. The men who accompanied Muhammad on the Hijrah were called the Muhajirun - "those that made the Hijrah" or the "Emigrants" - while those in Medina who became Muslims were called the Ansar or "Helpers."

Muhammad was well acquainted with the situation in Medina. Earlier, before the Hijrah, the city had sent envoys to Mecca asking Muhammad to mediate a dispute between two powerful tribes. What the envoys saw and heard had impressed them and they had invited Muhammad to settle in Medina. After the Hijrah, Muhammad's exceptional qualities so impressed the Medinans that the rival tribes and their allies temporarily closed ranks as, on March 15, 624, Muhammad and his supporters moved against the pagans of Mecca. 

Photo: The Ka'bah, spiritual axis of the Muslim world, stands in the courtyard of Mecca's Sacred Mosque. 
The first battle, which took place near Badr, now a small town southwest of Medina, had several important effects. In the first place, the Muslim forces, outnumbered three to one, routed the Meccans. Secondly, the discipline displayed by the Muslims brought home to the Meccans, perhaps for the first time, the abilities of the man they had driven from their city. Thirdly, one of the allied tribes which had pledged support to the Muslims in the Battle of Badr, but had then proved lukewarm when the fighting started, was expelled from Medina one month after the battle. Those who claimed to be allies of the Muslims, but tacitly opposed them, were thus served warning: membership in the community imposed the obligation of total support.

A year later the Meccans struck back. Assembling an army of three thousand men, they met the Muslims at Uhud, a ridge outside Medina. After an initial success the Muslims were driven back and the Prophet himself was wounded. As the Muslims were not completely defeated, the Meccans, with an army of ten thousand, attacked Medina again two years later but with quite different results. At the Battle of the Trench, also known as the Battle of the Confederates, the Muslims scored a signal victory by introducing a new defense. On the side of Medina from which attack was expected they dug a trench too deep for the Meccan cavalry to clear without exposing itself to the archers posted behind earthworks on the Medina side. After an inconclusive siege, the Meccans were forced to retire. Thereafter Medina was entirely in the hands of the Muslims. 

The Constitution of Medina - under which the clans accepting Muhammad as the Prophet of God formed an alliance, or federation - dates from this period. It showed that the political consciousness of the Muslim community had reached an important point; its members defined themselves as a community separate from all others. The Constitution also defined the role of non-Muslims in the community. Jews, for example, were part of the community; they were dhimmis, that is, protected people, as long as they conformed to its laws. This established a precedent for the treatment of subject peoples during the later conquests. Christians and Jews, upon payment of a yearly tax, were allowed religious freedom and, while maintaining their status as non-Muslims, were associate members of the Muslim state. This status did not apply to polytheists, who could not be tolerated within a community that worshipped the One God. 
Photo: Devout Muslims from all over the world gather for the pilgrimage for nearly fourteen centuries one of the most impressive religious gatherings in the world.
Ibn Ishaq, one of the earliest biographers of the Prophet, says it was at about this time that Muhammad sent letters to the rulers of the earth - the King of Persia, the Emperor of Byzantium, the Negus of Abyssinia, and the Governor of Egypt among others - inviting them to submit to Islam. Nothing more fully illustrates the confidence of the small community, as its military power, despite the battle of the Trench, was still negligible. But its confidence was not misplaced. Muhammad so effectively built up a series of alliances among the tribes his early years with the Bedouins must have stood him in good stead here- that by 628 he and fifteen hundred followers were able to demand access to the Ka'bah during negotiations with the Meccans. This was a milestone in the history of the Muslims. Just a short time before, Muhammad had to leave the city of his birth in fear of his life. Now he was being treated by his former enemies as a leader in his own right. A year later, in 629, he reentered and, in effect, conquered Mecca without bloodshed and in a spirit of tolerance which established an ideal for future conquests. He also destroyed the idols in the Ka'bah, to put an end forever to pagan practices there. At the same time Muhammad won the allegiance of 'Amr ibn al-'As, the future conqueror of Egypt, and Khalid ibn al-Walid, the future "Sword of God," both of whom embraced Islam and joined Muhammad . Their conversion was especially noteworthy because these men had been among Muhammad's bitterest opponents only a short time before. 
In one sense Muhammad's return to Mecca was the climax of his mission. In 632, just three years later, he was suddenly taken ill and on June 8 of that year, with his third wife 'Aishah in attendance, the Messenger of God "died with the heat of noon." 

The death of Muhammad was a profound loss. To his followers this simple man from Mecca was far more than a beloved friend, far more than a gifted administrator, far more than the revered leader who had forged a new state from clusters of warring tribes. Muhammad was also the exemplar of the teachings he had brought them from God: the teachings of the Quran, which, for centuries, have guided the thought and action, the faith and conduct, of innumerable men and women, and which ushered in a distinctive era in the history of mankind. His death, nevertheless, had little effect on the dynamic society he had created in Arabia, and no effect at all on his central mission: to transmit the Quran to the world. As Abu Bakr put it: "Whoever worshipped Muhammad , let him know that Muhammad is dead, but whoever worshipped God, let him know that God lives and dies not." 
- See more at: http://www.islamicity.com/articles/Articles.asp?ref=IC0801-3481#sthash.TwrVbvUH.dpuf
After Muhammad had preached publicly for more than a decade, the opposition to him reached such a high pitch that, fearful for their safety, he sent some of his adherents to Ethiopia, where the Christian ruler extended protection to them, the memory of which has been cherished by Muslims ever since. But in Mecca the persecution worsened. Muhammad's followers were harassed, abused, and even tortured. At last, therefore, Muhammad sent seventy of his followers off to the northern town of Yathrib, which was later to be renamed Medina ("The City"). Later, in the early fall of 622, he learned of a plot to murder him and, with his closest friend, Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, set off to join the emigrants.

In Mecca the plotters arrived at Muhammad's home to find that his cousin, 'Ali, had taken his place in bed. Enraged, the Meccans set a price on Muhammad's head and set off in pursuit. Muhammad and Abu Bakr, however, had taken refuge in a cave where, as they hid from their pursuers, a spider spun its web across the cave's mouth. When they saw that the web was unbroken, the Meccans passed by and Muhammad and Abu Bakr went on to Medina, where they were joyously welcomed by a throng of Medinans as well as the Meccans who had gone ahead to prepare the way.

This was the Hijrah - anglicized as Hegira - usually, but inaccurately, translated as "Flight" - from which the Muslim era is dated. In fact, the Hijrah was not a flight but a carefully planned migration which marks not only a break in history - the beginning of the Islamic era- but also, for Muhammad and the Muslims, a new way of life. Henceforth, the organizational principle of the community was not to be mere blood kinship, but the greater brotherhood of all Muslims. The men who accompanied Muhammad on the Hijrah were called the Muhajirun - "those that made the Hijrah" or the "Emigrants" - while those in Medina who became Muslims were called the Ansar or "Helpers."

Muhammad was well acquainted with the situation in Medina. Earlier, before the Hijrah, the city had sent envoys to Mecca asking Muhammad to mediate a dispute between two powerful tribes. What the envoys saw and heard had impressed them and they had invited Muhammad to settle in Medina. After the Hijrah, Muhammad's exceptional qualities so impressed the Medinans that the rival tribes and their allies temporarily closed ranks as, on March 15, 624, Muhammad and his supporters moved against the pagans of Mecca. 

Photo: The Ka'bah, spiritual axis of the Muslim world, stands in the courtyard of Mecca's Sacred Mosque. 
The first battle, which took place near Badr, now a small town southwest of Medina, had several important effects. In the first place, the Muslim forces, outnumbered three to one, routed the Meccans. Secondly, the discipline displayed by the Muslims brought home to the Meccans, perhaps for the first time, the abilities of the man they had driven from their city. Thirdly, one of the allied tribes which had pledged support to the Muslims in the Battle of Badr, but had then proved lukewarm when the fighting started, was expelled from Medina one month after the battle. Those who claimed to be allies of the Muslims, but tacitly opposed them, were thus served warning: membership in the community imposed the obligation of total support.

A year later the Meccans struck back. Assembling an army of three thousand men, they met the Muslims at Uhud, a ridge outside Medina. After an initial success the Muslims were driven back and the Prophet himself was wounded. As the Muslims were not completely defeated, the Meccans, with an army of ten thousand, attacked Medina again two years later but with quite different results. At the Battle of the Trench, also known as the Battle of the Confederates, the Muslims scored a signal victory by introducing a new defense. On the side of Medina from which attack was expected they dug a trench too deep for the Meccan cavalry to clear without exposing itself to the archers posted behind earthworks on the Medina side. After an inconclusive siege, the Meccans were forced to retire. Thereafter Medina was entirely in the hands of the Muslims. 

The Constitution of Medina - under which the clans accepting Muhammad as the Prophet of God formed an alliance, or federation - dates from this period. It showed that the political consciousness of the Muslim community had reached an important point; its members defined themselves as a community separate from all others. The Constitution also defined the role of non-Muslims in the community. Jews, for example, were part of the community; they were dhimmis, that is, protected people, as long as they conformed to its laws. This established a precedent for the treatment of subject peoples during the later conquests. Christians and Jews, upon payment of a yearly tax, were allowed religious freedom and, while maintaining their status as non-Muslims, were associate members of the Muslim state. This status did not apply to polytheists, who could not be tolerated within a community that worshipped the One God. 
Photo: Devout Muslims from all over the world gather for the pilgrimage for nearly fourteen centuries one of the most impressive religious gatherings in the world.
Ibn Ishaq, one of the earliest biographers of the Prophet, says it was at about this time that Muhammad sent letters to the rulers of the earth - the King of Persia, the Emperor of Byzantium, the Negus of Abyssinia, and the Governor of Egypt among others - inviting them to submit to Islam. Nothing more fully illustrates the confidence of the small community, as its military power, despite the battle of the Trench, was still negligible. But its confidence was not misplaced. Muhammad so effectively built up a series of alliances among the tribes his early years with the Bedouins must have stood him in good stead here- that by 628 he and fifteen hundred followers were able to demand access to the Ka'bah during negotiations with the Meccans. This was a milestone in the history of the Muslims. Just a short time before, Muhammad had to leave the city of his birth in fear of his life. Now he was being treated by his former enemies as a leader in his own right. A year later, in 629, he reentered and, in effect, conquered Mecca without bloodshed and in a spirit of tolerance which established an ideal for future conquests. He also destroyed the idols in the Ka'bah, to put an end forever to pagan practices there. At the same time Muhammad won the allegiance of 'Amr ibn al-'As, the future conqueror of Egypt, and Khalid ibn al-Walid, the future "Sword of God," both of whom embraced Islam and joined Muhammad . Their conversion was especially noteworthy because these men had been among Muhammad's bitterest opponents only a short time before. 
In one sense Muhammad's return to Mecca was the climax of his mission. In 632, just three years later, he was suddenly taken ill and on June 8 of that year, with his third wife 'Aishah in attendance, the Messenger of God "died with the heat of noon." 

The death of Muhammad was a profound loss. To his followers this simple man from Mecca was far more than a beloved friend, far more than a gifted administrator, far more than the revered leader who had forged a new state from clusters of warring tribes. Muhammad was also the exemplar of the teachings he had brought them from God: the teachings of the Quran, which, for centuries, have guided the thought and action, the faith and conduct, of innumerable men and women, and which ushered in a distinctive era in the history of mankind. His death, nevertheless, had little effect on the dynamic society he had created in Arabia, and no effect at all on his central mission: to transmit the Quran to the world. As Abu Bakr put it: "Whoever worshipped Muhammad , let him know that Muhammad is dead, but whoever worshipped God, let him know that God lives and dies not." 
- See more at: http://www.islamicity.com/articles/Articles.asp?ref=IC0801-3481#sthash.TwrVbvUH.dpuf