Political poisoning of Malaysian minds has incapacitated their
inherent abilities to do undertake political analysis. When issues of
public interest arise, all it takes is one brazen leader to give a red
herring response such as:
“Who is asking? We have shown many times that the trips taken by the
present officers (cost) much (less) that in the past (under BN rule
prior to 2008).
Then, most are silenced, cowering in fear that they might have
offended that leader. Before you begin your retort, allow me to share
with you a tale of two leaders.
Once upon a time in early November 2013, there were two leaders – one
from the east (Lim Guan Eng), the other from the West (Jim Lane, Mayor
of Scottsdale, Arizona, USA) who went to the 17th annual Inter-Islands
Tourism Policy (ITOP) Forum, held from November 6 to 9 in Haikou,
Hainan, China. Topics of discussion included how to preserve local
island culture while accommodating global tourism.
Jim Lane went alone and his trip was funded by the government of Haikou, Hainan.
Lim Guan Eng went with a 21-member delegation and the Penang state coffers footed the bill.
George Hartz, President of Scottsdale Sister Cities, said that Mayor
Jim Lane was given the opportunity to promote Scottsdale tourism at the
forum.
According to its official website, Inter-Islands Tourism Policy Forum
was founded in 1997 with the attendance of four provincial governments
of Bali, Indonesia, Hainan, China, Okinawa, Japan and Jeju, South Korea
led by Jeju.
This Forum is aimed at exploring the world tourism market jointly by
bring together islands that have cultural sympathy and similar tourism
structure and policy. The Forum has grown from four starting member
islands to 10 members including Jeju, Hainan, Okinawa, Bali, Southern
Province, Canary Islands, Zanzibar, Hawaii, Phuket and Cebu.
Note: Penang is NOT a member of ITOP. Hence, is it justified that the
21-member delegation of Penang government officers, their spouses and
business representatives visited China costing RM93,910 at the state’s
expense?
Whether or not BN spent more or less during their tenure is
irrelevant. It is merely pulling wool over our eyes so that we cannot
see the discrepancies therein.
The fact remains that the state paid the 21-member delegation to attend the forum and did the following:
1. They signed a MOU on establishment of Friendship Cities between
Penang and the Hainan provincial government. (done by the delegation)
2. They renewed the Friendship Cities relationship between Xiamen and
Penang on the 20th anniversary of this scheme. (done by the delegation)
3. Lim paid two courtesy calls on the government, leaders of industry,
the Xiamen mayor and the Hainan governor. (done by ONE person – LGE)
4. Lim delivered a talk at the ITOP Forum themed ‘Globalization and
Localization: Opportunity and Challenge for Island Tourism Development’.
(done by ONE person – LGE)
Look at the record of achievement for that trip and answer the
following question objectively. Is it justified that Lim Guan Eng needed
21 members, including his spouse at the expense of the state government
whereas Jim Lane went ALONE at the invitation of the Haikou government
who paid for his trip?
Who can forget his famous justification for his wife’s presence by
his statement whereby “We feel very lonely without our spouses, we go
with spouse is a problem, don’t go with spouse also a problem.”
Does such a statement reflect a person’s political and emotional maturity?
Think. Why did Haikou pay for Mayor Jim Lane’s participation at the ITOP forum? Food for thought.
For your information, Scottsdale has been recognized today as
Arizona’s 2013 eCity by tech giant Google. “Scottsdale’s growth and
innovation in e-commerce is an example that other cities across the
state can strive to replicate,” said Scott Levitan, Google’s director of
small business engagement, in a statement. “Google is proud to
recognize this growing entrepreneurial spirit and the role it plays in
creating jobs and sustaining local economies.”
Apart from the UNESCO Heritage listing for Penang (which has nothing
to do with current state government), what international accolades have
Lim and his team won for Penang? Any results for all the hot air
more-than-a-mouthful theme of Penang As An International And Intelligent
City Is Leveraged On Building A Liveable City That Attracts Human
Talent And Formulates People-Centric Policies That Transforms Penang
Into A Developed, Sustainable And Inclusive Economy Without Poverty?
Shallow and meaningless words such as these give an empty and hollow
ring when we see the congestion in Penang and the rising property prices
which have prevented real Penang kia from owning homes in the state.
Instead, we see foreigners, especially those from another island, who
are happily (in Monopoly style) taking over shopping malls, hawker
centres, even properties in heritage areas, and of course not forgetting
the many high-rise luxurious condominiums that few can even dream of
owning at all!
Finally, does it need an expenditure of RM93,910 for the ITOP and to
attend the 20th anniversary celebration of the establishment of sister
cities between Penang and Xiamen in Xiamen? Is Xiamen really so
important to Penang? Penang is not even listed in Wikipedia’s listing
for Xiamen.
In fact, if you were to Google for PENANG AND XIAMEN, what will
Google show you? The Balance of Trade in both states? Nope. Merely
flights and cheap tickets from Penang to Xiamen. Now what does that tell
you?
Analyze the objectives of the ITOP forum which include learning about
newly emerged trends in world tourism industry, enhancing the
relationship within the world’s Islands, broadening the network which
plays significant role in promoting the region as world’s best tourist
destination. These are roles played by the Ministry of Tourism! Look at
the list in the delegation. Should they have been there?
I am confounded at the way in which one person can lead so many by
their noses via red herrings and arrogant responses to justify a
meaningless trip by so many when clearly only ONE person should go. All
that hullabaloo protest by Lim Guan Eng serves to point us in the one
direction as to the real reason for the trip. Cut the crap and quit
pulling wool over our eyes. Justify why such a big delegation was sent
at the state’s expense for an event that is quite narrow in scope and
overlaps with the Tourism ministry’s portfolio.
By Datuk Huan Cheng Guan