PR IS FIGHTING FOR PREMIERSHIP AMONG THEMSELVES…PEOPLE’S WELFARE TAKES SECOND PLACE
Pakatan Rakyat (PR) is embroiled in the tussle oin who is going to bbe Prime Minister if…this is if…the opposition alliance managed to win the coming general election.
PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang did not reject the call for him to be the Prime Minister while the party deputy president Mohamed Sabu said PR leaders agreed to have Anwar Ibrahim as the PM.
And this is also echoed by DAP man Tan Seng Giaw who said that the decision as made by PR leaders in a meeting, wonder when was the meeting held and whether Hadi was present or not.
If Hadi was present, he would obviously tell the assembly that he could accept their proposal because it has been decided by the PR leaders meeting that Anwar should be PM.
Hadi, being a leader of an Islamic party which supposedly to promote all the Islamic characteristics would not lie to the delegates in the assembly if what Mat Sabu and Seng Giaw said was true.
He would have told the assembly that this had been decided and Anwar had been unanimously proposed to be the PM.
But since Hadi did not mentioned this to the assembly, Malaysians should take it what Mat Sabu or Seng Giaw or any other leaders from PR said on the matter about Anwar being the PM if they win is a lie.
Now if this is so, then the country is having problem if PR wins the election – the three parties in PR will be at each other’s throat trying to put their man as PM.
DAP may be the king maker in this scenario as the party has no Malay and the party never intend to put up a Malay candidate as it is a chauvinistic party, so it has the power to tilt decisions to its benefit.
And in this case, the party’s decision will be sure for Anwar as Anwar is secular and liberal compared to Islamic Hadi.
Given the fact that Hadi would still pursue the theologian state and Hudud laws, DAP would want to distance itself from such person so that it can continue pursuing its goal of a dominant Chinese political power in the country.
Having Anwar as PM is most convenient because the party has many secrets that it can ‘hold Anwar’s balls’ anytime if he goes out of control, and PKR cannot say anything as long as Anwar is the de facto chief.
So the ‘fight for the Prime Ministership’ will be the focus of PR if it wins the general election but before that, the fight is on now because PAS will never give up its aim – the goal it has been chasing since the 50s.
KLFCW wants people of the World to unite and UNANIMOUSLY AGREE that war is a crime.
Support us in criminalising war. WAR IS ABOUT KILLING, MASSIVE KILLING. Tell a friend about this site. Spread the word about the Kuala Lumpur Foundation to Criminalise War !War Criminal Conference and Exhibition October 28th to October 31st 2009 [Dewan Merdeka, PWTC, Kuala Lumpur]
bloggers against illegal street rally
SAY NO TO PORN
Malaysia should censor all pornographic material on the Internet
Peace On Earth- Stop Zionist Aggression Against Palestine
$AY NO TO MONEY POLITIC$
Buy Malaysian Goods
Support Our Local Brand
Save The Turtles
Help Save Turtles with Just One Signature
PLEASE DONATE BLOOD
We Are With You
Thank You For Your Services
BE AN ORGAN DONOR
Tegas, Adil dan Berhemah
CYBER POLICE CERTIFIED
Freedom with responsibility
PLANT A TREE
One big tree is the equivalent to 10 air conditioners
Intolerance is rampant at every level and in all age groups of the society, but it is more visible amongst the younger generation as our youth can be seen losing their altitude of patience over petty issues. We seriously need to think over it as what we are going to inculcate in them, which may help them seek success in future. Will it be tolerance or intolerance?
By Samra Arshad
International Conference "Expose War Crimes – Criminalise War"
“Wars increasingly involve the killings of innocent people and are therefore, abhorrent and criminal. Killings in war are as criminal as the killings within societies in times of peace. Since killings in peace time are subject to the domestic law of crime, killings in war must likewise be subject to the international law of crimes. This should be so irrespective of whether these killings in war are authorised or permitted by domestic laws.”